Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP )

On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 08:51:28AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

Why should a sending host also be a receiving host ?


It need not be, but it's quite common. It's the big mail servers that 
separate this to two machines or sets of machines.


s/, but is.*/, thus you cannot rely on it/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), (continued) Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Stuart D. Gathman Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), David MacQuigg Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Stuart D. Gathman Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), David MacQuigg Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Stuart D. Gathman Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Stuart D. Gathman Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Nico Kadel-Garcia Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), David MacQuigg Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), John A. Martin Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Nico Kadel-Garcia Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Alex van den Bogaerdt <= RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Mark RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), David MacQuigg RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Stuart D. Gathman RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Mark Re: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Dave Warren RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Scott Kitterman RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), David MacQuigg RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Stuart D. Gathman RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), David MacQuigg RE: Email Forwarder's Protocol ( EFP ), Stuart D. Gathman