spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RE: rr.com and SPF records

2005-03-16 14:14:51
This record is very acceptable, I believe it costs only 7 lookups max.
It also fits inside a UDP packet (512-bytes).

Regards,
Radu.


Todd Herr wrote:
So, just so I'm clear on things here...

Would the following be an acceptable SPF record for rr.com?

"v=spf1 ip4:24.30.203.0/24 ip4:24.28.200.0/24 \
        ip4:24.28.204.0/24 ip4:24.30.218.0/24 \
        ip4:24.93.47.0/24 ip4:24.25.9.0/24 \
        ip4:65.24.5.0/24 ip4:24.94.166.0/24 \
        ip4:24.29.109.0/24 ip4:66.75.162.0/24 \
        ip4:24.24.2.0/24 ip4:65.32.5.0/24 +mx ~all"

Acceptable, that is, from the standpoint of fewer than 10 methods
and guarding against the forged @rr.com sender that Radu spoke of
upthread?


-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper!  http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

Attachment: radu.vcf
Description: Vcard