On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, at 16:14, Radu Hociung wrote:
This record is very acceptable, I believe it costs only 7 lookups max.
It also fits inside a UDP packet (512-bytes).
Todd Herr wrote:
So, just so I'm clear on things here...
Would the following be an acceptable SPF record for rr.com?
"v=spf1 ip4:24.30.203.0/24 ip4:24.28.200.0/24 \
ip4:24.28.204.0/24 ip4:24.30.218.0/24 \
ip4:24.93.47.0/24 ip4:24.25.9.0/24 \
ip4:65.24.5.0/24 ip4:24.94.166.0/24 \
ip4:24.29.109.0/24 ip4:66.75.162.0/24 \
ip4:24.24.2.0/24 ip4:65.32.5.0/24 +mx ~all"
A ticket has been opened here to change the SPF record for rr.com
to just that, then. It's a low priority ticket, so it may be a
day or so till it's changed.
--
Todd Herr
Senior Security Policy Specialist/Postmaster V: 703.345.2447
Time Warner Cable IP Security M: 571.344.8619
therr(_at_)security(_dot_)rr(_dot_)com AIM:
RRCorpSecTH