Terry Fielder wrote:
I think we need to start collecting and discussing the possible domain
names for the official SPF website. A while back, Julian collected
this list of SPF websites:
http://spf.pobox.com
Please don't use this one, it has a reputation for sender id that needs
to be gotten rid of, and a reputation of not getting updated when it
should. Further, the fact the pobox does not use spf is shameful, and
hence not a good flagship.
Of course we can't just ditch it: http://spf.pobox.com/why.html (or
whatever it is called) is in every implementation out there is the
standard exp string. Practically every spf reject in the world uses that
page.
Koen