Allyn Wade wrote:
exists:%{l};%{i};%{h};%{r}_spf.nextbus.com
According to the latest spec:
The following macro letters are only allowed in "exp" text:
c = SMTP client IP (easily readable format)
r = domain name of host performing the check
t = current timestamp
So my implementation returns PermError when it sees this.
Does anyone think that it shouldn't be doing this?
No, it's reasonable, SPF is no spyware or spam-o-meter. The
PermError is justified, you treat it as "verboten" outside of
exp=. There's no good reason to support spies and spammers
in their endeavours.
Bye, Frank