On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, wayne wrote:
Now would be a good time to decide whether you want to file an IAB
appeal or not. There isn't much use in having the RFC editor do stuff
if we are just going to go into another 3-6 month delay.
I think it would be good to hear from the community at large on this
issue now and this can then be used by SPF Council when making a final
decision on it (I personally see council more as being body that decided
based on community consensus rather then makes decisions based only on
opinion of its members).
For myself I've decided not to file an appeal on decision regarding
Resent- fields even though I strongly disagree with IESG that approved
internet-wide experiments should be allowed to directly contradict
existing standards. That said the issue before spf-discuss is in regards
to its own appeal and conflicts between SPF and SID with using v=spf1
records - so this is what needs to be discussed. But if the result is
that we decide to file an IAB appeal, I may seek to attach comments
regarding conflicts with existing standards and how IESG decided on it
as part of that (without filing separate appeal).
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com