-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Scott Kitterman wrote:
IIRC, the DNS library it uses, pyDNS, doesn't support IPv6. That makes
it tough. The SPF specific part wouldn't be so hard. Not sure how I'd
test it though.
Retrofitting IPv6 support to libraries usually isn't all that hard. The
hardest part in retrofitting IPv6 support is address entry and output in
the user interface (command-line or graphical), but libraries usually
don't have that problem. So perhaps it would be an option to extend pyDNS
in cooperation with its authors?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEbuvzwL7PKlBZWjsRAgwVAKCsE66PRCS9u2CSRyZYqgHA4vhZKQCfVLmq
orA0WZlMsKqTAYH9ZsALFUk=
=zUso
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com