-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan wrote:
Any comments/suggestions/etc ? Do you think it's a good idea ? Is
there anything that could be changed in this message to make it impact
more positively in the image of SPF?
In theory it sounds like a good idea. Whether it's a good idea in
practice, too, depends on the actual false rejection rate. If you try it,
please report your results!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEv+NCwL7PKlBZWjsRArPRAJ9sdXA/I8IhiczrNpOTWvKOTioL1wCeMfQk
l7i7GPc9M/21bAO/IcERaFc=
=OThC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com