On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:10:41PM +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Millan wrote:
Any comments/suggestions/etc ? Do you think it's a good idea ? Is
there anything that could be changed in this message to make it impact
more positively in the image of SPF?
In theory it sounds like a good idea. Whether it's a good idea in
practice, too, depends on the actual false rejection rate. If you try it,
please report your results!
You don't need to try it to know the results. Instead of rejecting mails, you
can just generate an X-Best-Guess header, and after some time, grep your
mailboxes.
ATTOW, my ham box has 49 "X-Best-Guess:" headers, all with "pass". My spam box
has 4 with "neutral" and 2 with "pass".
I've just been generating this header for a few days, but the results are pretty
good so far. 0 false positives :).
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is honeypot(_at_)aybabtu(_dot_)com(_dot_) Note: this address is
only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com