spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: "authorized" == "not forged"?

2006-09-25 16:00:28
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frank Ellermann wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I created an account

[...]
Doesn't work (403).

Sorry.  Please try again.  I now gave you r/w permissions for the entire
/specs/drafts/ directory.

Before, I tried to give you permissions for the partial path "/specs/
drafts/draft-ellermann-", but it seems that Subversion's authorization 
logic doesn't support that.

If you desire broader access, just say the word.

I'd add marid-mailfrom-00, marid-protocol-03, and the bleeding
edge of SRS development, draft-mengwong-sender-rewrite-01 <g>

OK, please do so for the marid-* stuff.  I'm not sure we need the SRS 
draft, though.  It's of little historical interest, and Shevek's 
srs.pdf[1] is actually much more recent and complete.

Maybe user names containing spaces are a bad idea [...]

No, that's definitely not the issue.  I have been using user names with 
spaces with Subversion for a long time.

References:
 1. http://www.libsrs2.org/srs/srs.pdf

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFGF87wL7PKlBZWjsRAlYhAKCxYPzWacyvCL1EgZO+7+yiztm8GwCg9A7e
Rh+XqoBnGyXJB9dxTH4I4+M=
=VR9Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com