K.J. Petrie wrote:
What do people think? Is this a workable approach?
Good intention, but nothing justifying normative keywords like SHOULD,
let alone MUST. It's a "my host - my rules" receiver policy issue:
If an ISP doesn't support to selectively disable SPF for individual
users it's okay. And if a forwarder doesn't implement SRS it's also
okay. You as receiver might wish to to use either another forwarder
or another ISP, or you could pick a completely different setup for
your mails.
Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735