-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Seth Goodman wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote on Sunday, November 26, 2006 9:09 AM -0500:
Seth Goodman wrote:
Be aware that under Debian, where Exim is the default MTA, the
maintainers have packaged a special version of Exim compiled
without SPF support. Their docs state that they did this to avoid
encouraging the use of SPF, which they do not like.
I reviewed the exim4 source package, and as far as I could see, this
is NOT true for the current packages.
The memo you cite concerns development of future packages. The current
stable release of Debian (sarge) includes Exim 4.50 with upstream
patches.
Oops, you're right. I am not into the stable distribution (I use testing
instead), so I missed that. However, a new stable distribution is about
to be released soon, which will include those "future packages".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFamo1wL7PKlBZWjsRApd4AKCkdEXr5B/fSb/9Q4xZY3mQ2HGeuwCg7vRV
ijwL66KOypHgkJYVjD++WRg=
=J+Pd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735