-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Vince Lotito wrote:
Hi, I've been using SPF and following this community for a couple of
years. I applaud the work of the SPF community.
I was contacted last week by a NJ State Assemblyman for my feedback on
an assembly bill title "The New Jersey SPAM Deterrence Act". In short
the bill was not that comprehensive, and after reading my suggestions
the Assemblyman has decide to redraft the bill.
Therefore, I was looking to incorporate SPF into that legislation. So
with that, I am looking for ideas, suggestion and feedback from the
community...
I don't generally like the idea of anti-spam laws depending on specific
technologies. But perhaps we could come up with some useful ideas if you
could expand a bit on the scope of the law, and perhaps provide us with a
draft text?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFdFa1wL7PKlBZWjsRAipsAJ4zHMOVCAWUPwiup1TiSjTLNSCUnACeO0CB
9ndjfyPBUTc/hIrQmhEijAc=
=gzl6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735