-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dusan,
have you tried XT? I never used it, but it claims to be fast. And James
Clark wrote it, thats generally a good sign.
You can find it here: http://www.blnz.com/xt/index.html
You can also start xsltproc with --timing and --profile which gives you
information about which templates consume most of the time. Perhaps you
can tune you xsl once you know where the bottleneck is.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Dusan Zatkovsky wrote:
| On Thursday 30 of September 2004 16:29, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
|
|>xsltproc.
|
|
| I will extend this question.
|
| Does anybody know some other and fast xslt processors written in c/c++
| except xalan and xsltproc for linux?
|
| I have this problem:
|
| I want to transform big xml documents to text data.
|
| Situation:
|
| xml size=2MB
| XalanC transforms it ok, but speed is 4-5 times slower than xsltproc.
| Parsing/transforming time is 1:2. So when I run Xalan, it tooks about
| 8 sec to initialize and 15 sec to transform.
|
| xsltproc transform it ok with speed 4-5 times faster than XalanC.
| Parsing/transforming time is about 1:1 (3 and 4 seconds)
|
|
| xml size=17MB
| XalanC transforms it ok, but speed is 4-5 times slower than xsltproc.
| Parsing/transforming times are 20/60 sec.
|
| But xsltproc initialization tooks very long time (after 5 minutes I
| have killed that process).
|
| So, I can't use xsltproc to transform big xml files (and our project
| need to transform up to 300-400MB xml files) and can't use XalanC
| because low transforming speed.
|
| Anybody can help me?
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBZsMkqjaicDyx8o8RAlw4AKCFfnnO4td/A2kZ4QfmSfomsasNLwCfc7Fj
YnGrem6eCE1hOWwUg7TkDHk=
=8GUm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----