Michael Kay wrote:
Hi
It's certainly true that type-checking rules make it harder to
generate code that will get through the compiler
Oh yes! Especially with a smart processor as Saxon...
but I think that's a price worth paying.
I think so.
On the other hand, maybe a way to tell the processor to deactivate
static error checks at one place (because we know the generated code
there is correct even if it can look suspicious) would be interesting.
Regards,
--drkm
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible
contre les messages non sollicités
http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--