Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful

Whatever the technical merits of richtext, it has always seemed to me
too new and un-experimented-with to be included in RFC-MIME.  It would
make good sense to put it in its own RFC.

Bill

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Guido van Rossum richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Markku Savela richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Erik Naggum Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Greg Vaudreuil Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Bill Janssen <= Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Dave Crocker Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Dave Crocker SGML compliance/compatibility, Erik Naggum Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Bill Cattey Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Luc Rooijakkers Well, not that harmful (was Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful), Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Well, not that harmful (was Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful), lwj Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Keld J\|rn Simonsen Re: richtext <nl> model considered harmful, Walt Daniels