RE: file attachments in MIME

> I am really uncomfortable with this as stated. First of all, the
> "primary" should come first, to help out older MUAs. But this
> multipart seems like a kludge to me. If we need to determine whether a
> bodypart is intended as an attachment or an in-line item, it seems to
> me that we are talking about an attribute of the bodypart in question;
> the Content-Disposition header seems the best to me.
I am in complete agreement with this. Well said.

                                Ned