Re: text/enriched: Throwing in the towel

Most of your comments make perfect sense and I'll incorporate them, thanks.

> Excerpts from mail: 2-Sep-93 Re: text/enriched: Throwing.. John Gardiner Myers(_at_)cmu(_dot_) (897)


> I don't follow why turning off filling necessarily changes the newline
> model.  The same avoid-transport-line-wrapping argument for the base
> text/enriched newline model would appear to also apply to text inside
> nofill.

Eek!  I presume you're referring to the clause "and hence without any special handling of CRLFs".  I believe that was mindlesly copied from the old "verbatim" language.  I've elminated it.  

> The minimal conformance section does not mention the special-case
> beginning-of-line handling of <center>, <flushleft>, <flushright>, and
> <excerpt>.  The sample parser does not do this handling.

Well, I wasn't thinking of this as part of the necessary minimum.  Should it be?

> The sample parser appears to botch the following stream:

It seemed fine to me.  Can you define "botch"?  -- Nathaniel