After all the previous discussion, perhaps its time for a
(hopefully succinct) restatement of positions, I will take the
liberty of posing the Q:
Thank you much. ;-)
Why would <param> ignorable_param_data_block </param> be unfortunate?
Because j-random-existing parser would (SHOULD!)
display the ignorable_param_data_block as part of the message.
--
dana s emery <de19(_at_)Umail(_dot_)umd(_dot_)edu>
I'm sorry I didn't put in this $0.02 before text/enriched
got out in the first place. :-( That's how it goes, I guess.
It should be:
<foo_bar_command ignorable param tokens>
--
Rick Troth <troth(_at_)rice(_dot_)edu>, Rice University, Information Systems