On Sun, 19 Nov 1995, Al Gilman wrote:
are equivalent. And we should consider whether
Content-Location: "url"
should be written using Content-Disposition, e.g., with:
Content-Disposition: inline; uri="url"
since the location presented is not *actually* the location of the
data, but rather the header says that you should treat the embedded
content AS IF it were at that location.
That was not the way I intended it when I wrote the IETF draft.
My intention was that "Content-Location" should only be used when
it includes a real URL/URI which can be used to really retrieve
the content. In cases where the content is not available via
remote access, only as part of the e-mail message, then my
intention was to use the "file name" or "cid" method.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacob Palme <jpalme(_at_)dsv(_dot_)su(_dot_)se> (Stockholm University and KTH)
for more info see URL: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme