ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt

2002-02-11 08:46:52

At 09:21 AM 2/11/2002 -0500, Keith Moore wrote:
> To repeat, the real debate here is about parental controls on
> registrations,

What I had in mind was a consensus model with a designated expert
making the final call.

Having the "parent" be a group does not change the model or the problems with it.


At 09:55 AM 2/11/2002 -0500, Keith Moore wrote:
I think that specs for new header fields should be published as RFCs.

The world has multiple venues for publication of Internet specifications. The only concern for publication venue should be reliability of long-term access.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>