Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry
2002-02-11 15:23:23
On 2/11/02 at 9:29 PM +0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
Arnt Gulbrandsen writes:
the IETF AD or a designated expert can add a comment such as "don't
implemenent"...
So the AD can say such a thing without community consensus?
No, they ought not, and if they do, they ought to be held accountable
for it. (They don't have to start a brand new discussion every time
they need to judge that consensus, but if they don't, they better
judge correctly.) Failure to get community consensus or to judge it
wrongly should result in appeal of their decision and eventual
removal from their position if they do it regularly.
If ISOC, IAB, IESG, IANA, et al. allow their names to be attached to
such statements, they will be held liable under United States
antitrust law for anticompetitive effects of those statements. See
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=456&invol=556
for a Supreme Court decision imposing liability upon an engineering
standards organization for giving subcommittee chairs authority to
make such statements. The organization ended up paying $4.75 million.
In ASME v. Hydrolevel, the court held ASME liable for the FRAUDULENT
acts of one of its officers who acted FOR HIS OWN (or in this case,
his companies) BENEFIT within the scope of his authority. And yes, if
an ISOC, IAB, IESG, IANA, et. al. member makes a FRAUDULENT statement
FOR THEIR OWN BENEFIT for an anticompetitive purpose, they (and the
IETF) might well be held liable for such an action. (Given who was in
the majority and dissent in that case in that case and the current
makeup of the court, there might be some question about whether they
would be held liable, but if they still believe in stare decisis...)
In any event, I see no reason to believe that the sorts of statements
we currently see from the IESG and other members of the IETF,
especially from the likes of Keith, have much of a chance of falling
under the constraints of the case you cited.
BTW: I am not a lawyer, but you can take the above opinions in light
of the obscene number of such people in my family and the intro
constitutional law class I took almost 20 years ago (just about when
that decision was handed down from the court).
--
Pete Resnick <mailto:presnick(_at_)qualcomm(_dot_)com>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt, (continued)
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt, Dave Crocker
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt, Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt, Dave Crocker
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt, Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt, Dave Crocker
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt, Keith Moore
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-02.txt, Dave Crocker
- Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Dave Crocker
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry,
Pete Resnick <=
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Keith Moore
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Dave Crocker
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Dave Crocker
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Dave Crocker
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Paul Smith
- Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry, Barry Leiba
|
|
|