Re: Time to act: draft-klyne-msghdr-registry

Dave Crocker <dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
> Writing a spec that has one's name on it very much IS a barrier.
Are you saying that you want anonymous specs, or that you want new header
field names without associated specs?

> repeat 10 times:  this is a registry, not a standards process.
Yes? The latest draft I see requires that each new registration contains a
"defining document". Old names seem to be grandfathered in by a host of
references, although that isn't said explicitly.

--Arnt