I assume you refer to [1] [2]. See also [3] for an example of possible
registry data on the Web.
Some of the verbosity is in response to comments on the registry proposal
draft.
Based on the data we have assembled, the registration data is quite easily
presented in different forms. Do you have any specific suggestions?
#g
--
[1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klyne-hdrreg-mail-01.txt
(whose content is set to be updated, with input from Jacob Palme)
[2] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-00.txt
[3]
http://www.ninebynine.org/IETF/Messaging/HdrRegistry/MailHeaderPermanentRegistry.html
http://www.ninebynine.org/IETF/Messaging/HdrRegistry/MailHeaderProvisionalRegistry.html
At 10:18 AM 11/5/02 +0000, Charles Lindsey wrote:
In <p05200e26b9ecc4e303e9(_at_)[165(_dot_)227(_dot_)249(_dot_)18]> Paul Hoffman / IMC
<phoffman(_at_)imc(_dot_)org> writes:
>>The IESG has received a request to consider Registration procedures for
>>message header fields <draft-klyne-msghdr-registry-05.txt> as a BCP.
>>This has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an IETF
>>Working Group.
I think we were all happy with the final draft, but there is still the
question of the initial registry. Yes, there was a draft published, and I
ought to have commented earlier. My only problem with it was that the
format was too verbose and repetitive (the same URL appearing many times,
once for each header introduced by a particular RFC).
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own
thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web:
http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clw(_dot_)cs(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU,
U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4
AB A5
-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK(_at_)NineByNine(_dot_)org>