I agree there is tension but that should not mitigate the requirement or cause
us to try to much compromise unless it can not be solved (which I think it
can).
-e
On Friday, March 28, 2003 12:31 PM, John R Levine
[SMTP:johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com] wrote:
Requirement 2) The proposal SHOULD be amenable to legislation, in place or
pending as close as possible.
Requirement 4) The proposal SHOULD provide implementation specifics that
address the issues of privacy, security and which reflect end use choices,
of
either providers or users.
Is there some concurrence on this?
Sure, so long as you realize there's some tension between the two.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet
for
Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://iecc.com/johnl, Sewer
Commissioner
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg