On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:07:20PM -0400, Kee Hinckley wrote
How much do they care; 75 cents' worth ? It's their decision, just
like with snail-mail versus courirer.
No. That's a sender decision. I'm talking about a receiver
decision. And the problem is that if the receiver starts paying for
receipt of messages (e.g. to their sales line) then they are open to
a different kind of for-profit spam.
Please re-read my original proposal. It includes the sentence...
The general public could join with free "read-only" accounts, with
the option of sending one-off messages for a low fee.
Most customers of UPS/Fedex/Purolator are businesses, and have
accounts with them. But individuals do use couriers occasionally when
the need arises, and pay a one-off fee. The "Business ISP" is to be
a "sender-pays" system. The sender *ALWAYS* pays for messages sent.
The receiver *NEVER* pays for messages recieved.
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes(_at_)waltdnes(_dot_)org>
Email users are divided into two classes;
1) Those who have effective spam-blocking
2) Those who wish they did
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg