On Tuesday 18 November 2003 11:41, Jon Kyme wrote:
Not meaning to presume on the role of the chairs...
It would probably be useful if those who haven't taken the trouble to read
the charter of this group - did so.
http://www.irtf.org/charters/asrg.html
I have. The charter simply notes the problem defining spam and punts on the
problem.
It might also be instructive to check out the archives of this list.
Here's a good one:
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/asrg/current/msg07341.html
Spam definitions? No thanks. We have a "consent-based communication" model.
Spam is the other stuff :-)
Fair enough. Established order has spoken and dissension is unwelcome. The
message is clear, and I will act accordingly.
-- Marc A. Pelletier
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg