I think "abuse" is pretty much the de facto standard, supported by rfc2142,
adopting anything else would take some justifying.
Perhaps. However, when I am in the "reporting mood", I often find places
which do not use "abuse(_at_)somedomain(_dot_)com" and instead use anything from
postmaster@, support@, spam@, or a whole host of other addresses. They
often have this information buried on some support web page making it all
the more difficult to find. On the other hand, perhaps that is the point.
In either case, while most use abuse(_at_)somedomain(_dot_)com, there still are
surprisingly many who do not.
-Art
--
Art Pollard
http://www.lextek.com/
Suppliers of High Performance Text Retrieval Engines.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg