On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:02:51PM +0000, Jon Kyme wrote:
I think "abuse" is pretty much the de facto standard, supported by
rfc2142,
adopting anything else would take some justifying.
Yes, but abuse @ whatdomain?
The most reliable information is the IP address from which the spam
was injected into my system.
I believe the question of inadequate whois data is being addressed
elsewhere. Or is your proplem that operators solicit reports pertaining to
spam at one particular address (not 'abuse') yet support the 'abuse'
address for other network abuse?
--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg