I think "abuse" is pretty much the de facto standard, supported by rfc2142,
adopting anything else would take some justifying.
Perhaps. However, when I am in the "reporting mood", I often find places
which do not use "abuse(_at_)somedomain(_dot_)com" and instead use anything
from
postmaster@, support@, spam@, or a whole host of other addresses.
You know, that's exactly why I run abuse.net.
In any event, if we have a standard format, the networks that want it
will surely tell us where to send it. Maybe it'll be abuse, maybe
it'll make sense to invent a new address like autoabuse, but that's
a detail.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
http://www.taugh.com
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg