Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions
2004-12-23 16:12:20
Somebody wrote, among other things, about how much storage space spam was
costing them.
Email should be changed so that the contents of a email lives on the
sender's server until it is retrieved by the recipient.
It shifts the storage costs to the sender, especially the big sender, and
forces some kind of accountability onto the sender and/or the sender's ISP.
An email with foged headers to non-existent servers will not be read.
It does break the much-revered model that makes the Internet resistant to a
Nuclear Attack but spam (and its sisters - worms and viruses) pose a greater
danger than the threat of Nuclear War.
Jed Margolin
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, (continued)
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Jon Kyme
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, gep2
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions,
Jed Margolin <=
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Seth Breidbart
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Barry Shein
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Devdas Bhagat
- Re: [Asrg] Mailing lists, John Levine
- Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Barry Shein
Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Barry Shein
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Asrg] SICS, gep2 |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Barry Shein |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, gep2 |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Asrg] Spam, defined, and permissions, Devdas Bhagat |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|