On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, John Levine wrote:
Expecting people to use the "spam" button will lead to incorrect
reports. Now, if we can get the software triggering the report to
generate an unsubscribe request instead, the quality of the feedback
loop will be improved. But that would be something beyond the scope
of ARF.
I dunno about you, but whenever I get an ARF report on a message from
a mailing list, my software treats it as an unsubscribe. I would be
surprised if other list managers didn't do the same.
We do the same, and ARF reports are no particular bother to us. The
members of this list who are incensed by ARF reports are running systems
whree they do not have the ability to remove names, i.e. they are running
MTAs for ISPs and want ARF reports limited to those that would justify
canceling a customer contract. These of course are non-existant if you do
not send spam.
System administrators in general are not good at empathy, and are quick to
condem as useless or harmful anything that is not useful to them. Hence
the overwrought condemnations of ARF in this forum. But of course the ARF
reports themselves are an instance of AOL not showing empathy for the the
many receipients who cannot act on an unsubscribe request for non-spam
messages.
In general, the ARF mechanism has become an inferior substitute for the
List-unsubscribe header documented in RFC2369 (see also
http://www.list-unsubscribe.com/ ) but there is no reason that both cannot
exisit in parallel. AOL should add an "Unsubscribe" button for messages
with List-unsubscribe headers.
Daniel Feenberg
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg