ietf-asrg
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Asrg] MX, was Adding a spam button to MUAs

2010-02-13 12:28:38
At 10:49 10-02-10, der Mouse wrote:
Why not?  The "rough consensus" appears to be that "anything is
acceptable provided Google does it", so on "rough consensus and running
code" grounds, yes, what Google does _should_ set the spec.

If that is the rough consensus, I'll wait for the publication of those specifications. :-)

At 05:05 11-02-10, Ian Eiloart wrote:
What I'm suggesting is that things currently permitted by standards might not be permitted by local policy. I don't like the situation that a DNS lookup can't tell me whether an email domain really is supposed to be deliverable.

If your local policy is to reject my messages, there is nothing I can do about it.

At 06:27 11-02-10, John Leslie wrote:
three assumptions listed above are all false today, but I agreed to
accept the consensus call on this issue for RFC 5321 because with Doug
Otis on one side and Dave Crocker on the other, I didn't want to wait
for one of them to die.

:-)

It was a very long discussion where there was also several other parties that debated about both sides of the argument.

Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)irtf(_dot_)org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg