Eric, a couple of incompatible changes have already been identified that
have been deemed to be "necessary for the success of the
specifications". So the barrier has already been broken. While your
concerns are valid in theory, I don't think they will be a problem in
practice.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
Eric Rescorla wrote:
Barry Leiba <leiba(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com> writes:
Since experimentation resulted in significant Internet deployment of these
specifications, the DKIM working group will make every reasonable attempt to
keep changes compatible with what is deployed, making incompatible changes
only when they are necessary for the success of the specifications.
I'm generally comfortable with this charter, but not really with this.
"necessary for the success of the specifications" seems like a very
high bar to clear. While I appreciate that there's a desire by many members
of the WG to avoid making incompatible changes (hence this language),
to the extent to which that desire reflects consensus, those
changes won't be made anyway. I don't believe it's appropriate to
rule discussion of changes which might be important but not
"necesssary" out of scope in the charter.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org