Dave Crocker wrote:
But in the worst case, the list has simply invalidated the signature,
and we say that this SHOULD be considered equivalent to no signature
at all. Absent SSP, this is no bad thing.
I am inclined to agree. However the [] behavior is rather common. So
we probably should consider whether it is reasonable to have DKIM
contain features that are intended to allow a signature survive
mailing list transit, when we know that the final result will usually
fail.
Is this one case where DKIM could have an impact on list configuration
behavior?
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html