On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 10:01:03AM -0700, J.D. Falk wrote:
On 2007-03-12 16:51, Hector Santos wrote:
I tend to side with the high probability that blindly signing MAIL in a
DKIM-BASE only manner (with no helper support, and I presume you are
just against SSP, not other kind of helpers, like DAC or some other yet
to be established reputation helper)
Hmm, not sure who you're arguing with here -- can't be me, I'm not
against SSP. Never have been. I just don't think it's a good idea to
continue telling the world that DKIM isn't ready.
I don't think the 'world' understands that DKIM is just a building
block.
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html