On 2007-03-12 16:51, Hector Santos wrote:
I tend to side with the high probability that blindly signing MAIL in a
DKIM-BASE only manner (with no helper support, and I presume you are
just against SSP, not other kind of helpers, like DAC or some other yet
to be established reputation helper)
Hmm, not sure who you're arguing with here -- can't be me, I'm not
against SSP. Never have been. I just don't think it's a good idea to
continue telling the world that DKIM isn't ready.
--
J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager
Yahoo! Mail
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html