On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:55:42 -0000, Wietse Venema <wietse(_at_)porcupine(_dot_)org>
wrote:
Will you give "no signature" equal treatment to "bad signature",
or will you give mail with bad signatures (such as a valid header
that was pasted on top of a forged body) more favorable treatment?
That is a matter for each verifier to decide. Over time, many ingenious
strategies for distinguishing the scams from the accidents may be devised,
and we should welcome that. The examples I gave merely indicated a few of
the possibilities.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html