-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 2:11 PM
To: Brett McDowell
Cc: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] the danger of ADSP, was list vs contributor
The basic problem with ADSP is that we shipped an untested prototype,
and
at this point the only way to test it is to try experiments and hope
they
don't do too much damage before we have a chance to tweak and mitigate
the
problems. I appreciate that Paypal's intentions are entirely virtuous,
and that you deal with problems pretty quickly for a large
organization.
If we all agree that that's a valid characterization of ADSP, I suggest we move
to get it downgraded from Proposed Standard to Experimental. There's certainly
a lot of rhetoric suggesting it's an experiment that's in the process of
failing, though the experiment is also arguably not complete.
At any rate, I'm happy to participate in an effort to specify something that
actually stands a chance of working, and test it in widely available software.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html