ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871 5322.From Binding - Proposal to relax it.

2010-09-16 04:23:12


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 12:57 AM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871 5322.From Binding - Proposal to relax
it.



Since anyone can generate a DKIM signature with a signing domain they
control, an unconstrained 3rd party signing policy means precisely
nothing. Without some kind of constraint (1st party only or a defined
set
of third party signers) arbitrary senders could meet the policy
requirements.

- 1.

Scott K

Make that a -2 for all the reasons Scott indicated. 

Mike

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>