Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871 5322.From Binding - Proposal to relax it.

Since there's no such thing as a "3rd party signing policy" in DKIM or 
ADSP, I don't understand why we're even discussing this.
R's,
John


On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> > bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 12:57 AM
> > To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
> > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871 5322.From Binding - Proposal to relax
> it.
> > >
> > Since anyone can generate a DKIM signature with a signing domain they
> > control, an unconstrained 3rd party signing policy means precisely
> > nothing. Without some kind of constraint (1st party only or a defined
> set
> > of third party signers) arbitrary senders could meet the policy
> > requirements.
> >
> > - 1.
> >
> > Scott K
> Make that a -2 for all the reasons Scott indicated.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for 
Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
Please consider the environment before sending e-mail.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html