Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joi

> > Good point.  So it's two things, lists should sign outgoing mail, and
> > discard any incoming mail with dkim=discardable.
> No, they should reject the email at SMTP time. The email is NOT discardable 
> when it arrives at the MLM. Rejection at SMTP time does no harm, and gives 
> the sender an opportunity to fix the problem.
OK, so during the SMTP session, more particularly during the interval 
between receiving the dot at the end of data and returning a status code, 
my SMTP daemon needs to:
* identify recipient addresses that are mailing lists

* look for DKIM signatures in the message header

* find the From: address

* if there's a signature with a d= that matches the From: address, do the 
calculations to generate the DKIM hash, fetch the key record from the DNS, 
and see if it's good
* if there's not a good author signature, fetch the ADSP record and see 
what it says
* if it says discardable, return 5xx

* otherwise return 2xx

That seems an awful lot of work to do with the connection open to deal 
with what is unlikely to be more than a rare misconfiguration.  When you 
made these changes to your MTA, how much work was it?  How much effect did 
it have on overall MTA performance?  If you haven't implemented them, why 
not?
And since this group seems to be obsessed with arcane corner cases, what 
do you do with a discardable message if it's sent to two addresses, one of 
which is a mailing list and one of which isn't?
R's,
John

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html