ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)

2011-04-01 15:56:03
On 4/1/11 1:31 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
I had the feeling that Y! was using the local part of i= to do 
differentiation in reputation. ie various streams within the same domain.

I know the spec intent recommends, different domains for different streams, 
but then....

Intuition would tell me, that few people are willing (or understand) to have 
different domains for different streams.

+1. And as DKIM d= information already is shown to end users by some UA 
implementations (e.g. Gmail shows 'this message was signed by <domain>, 
when clicking on details) the need/advise to use different domains for 
different streams conflicts with the threat of phishers registering 
look-alike domains.

/rolf
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>