Dave CROCKER wrote:
The distinction that needs to be made is between formally-specified output
vs.
implementation-specific access to DKIM internals.
i= was never intended to be "DKIM internals". That's why the entire gambit to
make d= the only show in town sucked.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html