----- Original Message -----
From: "John Levine" <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com>
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Cc: franck(_at_)genius(_dot_)com
Sent: Monday, 4 April, 2011 4:09:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal: Removal of AUID (i= tag/value)
Another way is to have a dkim tag that specify the header that
indicates the stream classification
Many ways to kill the same bird.
If there is a reason why people aren't able to use a d= domain per
stream, I wish someone would explain in simple terms that even a
dimwit like me can understand.
The only arguments I'm aware of is that hostile or incompetent DNS
managers refuse to install key records, which isn't a very good reason
to add cruft to a standard and "I want to do it some other way" which
is even worse.
you can lead a horse to water....
I'm curious of the reasons too, I see some data points, but cannot conclude any
statistics...
May be from the people who do statistics on DKIM, do you see a fair percentage
of DKIM signed sub-domains?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html