ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Work group future

2011-04-02 02:11:33
John R. Levine wrote:
By closing down the WG the momentum will be lost;

There's plenty of momementum in MAAWG and other operational fora.  The 
IETF is about standards development.  You don't get deployment by keeping 
a standards WG going.

Not suggesting to keep the bar open for after hours drinks and 
ramblings whispers, but MAAWG represents a itsy-bitsy fragment of the 
total mail network population interest.  Its not the IETF and I would 
suggest an aura is present that the "job is not done" especially when 
there are still active discussions about removing, deprecating, 
changing this and that, and there is still a chartered POLICY standard 
development work item yet not complete.


-- 
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>