Plus, the future of DKIM doesn't have to come from this WG. If there's
momentum to be preserved, interested people can spin up a DKIMbis WG or
something similar. The domain reputation stuff and DOSETA both have people
talking at the IETF, for example.
________________________________________
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
[johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 2:40 PM
To: Rolf E. Sonneveld
Cc: DKIM List
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Work group future
By closing down the WG the momentum will be lost;
There's plenty of momementum in MAAWG and other operational fora. The
IETF is about standards development. You don't get deployment by keeping
a standards WG going.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet
for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html