So should forward add Resent-* information? Pete Resnick told me a long
time ago it should, but I forgot to write it down.
I'm under the impression that it should.
From: "Barry Leiba" <leiba(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 13:27:39 -0500
Furthermore, I also would like to see a copy-forward action: instead of
forwarding, deliver the message and send a copy to the specified address.
There's nothing wrong with using "forward" and "fileinto" (or "keep")
together to accomplish this.
I agree with Barry.
(BTW, I find it *much* more useful to use "envelopesender" than to use
the document header fields. Suppose I'm subscribed to the IMAP, ACAP,
IMAPEXT, and MTA-FILTERS mailing lists, and someone posts something to
all of them. With "envelopesender" I can sort the four copies into their
respective folders. Without it, there's no way to do that.)
Not true.
if header ["to", "cc"] :contains ["ietf-mta-filters(_at_)imc(_dot_)org"] {
fileinto "INBOX.mta-filters";
}
if header ["to", "cc"] :contains ["imap(_at_)cac(_dot_)washington(_dot_)edu"] {
fileinto "INBOX.imap-list";
}
[etc.]
Or am I just completely missing something?
This doesn't work if a mailing list has multiple names.
Simply matching against return-path doesn't work for mailing lists that
do VERPs. See Dan Bernstein's weekly rant on the subject for more
information, although qmail/ezmlm isn't the only one that does it,
either. Mostly it works if you do a glob of some kind, I think.
--
Tim Showalter <tjs+(_at_)andrew(_dot_)cmu(_dot_)edu>