On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
Not serious, no - that overloading is too repulsive for me to be serious
about. But also not joking. Wondering why I couldn't dismiss the idea.
It seemed ridiculous, but also...
Ah. I would just consider it to be the wrong place, even if one
did want a separate session to watch mailboxes and folders.
(One might bury that in this MUPDATE thing, for example.)
MUPDATE doesn't deal with anything on the per-message level. Though, if
you wanted to be notified of mailbox creation/deletion, that would be much
closer to the problem that MUPDATE solves.
-Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski | Andrew Systems Group * Research Systems Programmer
PGP:0x5CE32FCC | Cyert Hall 207 * rjs3(_at_)andrew(_dot_)cmu(_dot_)edu *
412.268.7456
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT/CM/PA d- s+: a-- C++++$ ULS++++$ P+++$ L+++(++++) E W+ N o? K-
w O- M-- V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5+++ R@ tv-@ b+ DI+++ G e++ h r- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----