Re: New Sieve extension "refuse" proposal - draft-elvey-refuse-sieve-01h

Matthew Elvey (FM) writes:
> http://www.elvey.com/it/sieve/draft-elvey-refuse-sieve-01h.txt
I suggest adding a sentence saying that SMTP refusal may happen at the 
RCPT TO or DATA stages, depending on what's convenient to the 
implementation. (I suppose it might also happen at the MAIL FROM stage, 
if a systemwide sieve does the refusal.)
The 550 result code is a fine thing, but shouldn't you also specify an 
extended result code (1893/2034)? 5.7.1, perhaps?
Arnt